07 January 2009


Fatah nel mirino di Hamas. Non si ha notizia di dimostrazioni in Europa.

Sulla retorica della tregua - in stile Corrierino, ma meglio di niente.

Questioni di proporzione. Glucksmann, come al solito, acuto: A meno che non occorra contare allo stesso livello non solo i mezzi militari, ma anche gli scopi perseguiti. Poiché Hamas - contrariamente all'Autorità palestinese - si ostina a non riconoscere allo Stato ebraico il diritto di esistere e sogna l'annientamento dei suoi cittadini, non sarebbe il caso che Israele imitasse questo spirito radicale e procedesse a una gigantesca pulizia etnica? Si vuole veramente che Israele rispetti, in misura proporzionale, le ambizioni sterminatrici di Hamas?

Intanto, sul terreno.

Nel dubbio che qualcuno dica non avevo capito : qui Krauthammer, e qui Barry Rubin in una vecchia traduzione di yours truly. E ci aggiungo VDH qui e qui:

Gaza is a sort of lab experiment in the Middle East. Recall for a minute: the Israelis withdrew en masse, a so-called “retreat” that reverberated all over the Middle East. The West supported free and open elections that gave Hamas their legitimacy, such as it was. Gaza is strategically placed on the Mediterranean with a prime shoreline. It borders Egypt the traditional center of the Arab world. Hundreds of millions of dollars of Middle-East oil money, and Western relief donations have poured into the tiny state. Israeli clearly wants no more of it, and would love to let Gaza alone to be Dubai.

The result?

Hamas with its serial rocket attacks on Israel interprets all of the above not as an opportunity for prosperity, but as a stage one for the great accomplishment of its generation—the absolute destruction of the Jewish state. Its agenda is clear and unambiguous, and apparently shared by millions of elites in the West itself, without whose support Hamas could not exist. The common theme of Western press coverage is the misery of Gaza, never the misery of Gaza as a product of the garrison-state mentality of Hamas’s radical Islamic vows to wage perennial war against Israel.

Hamas counts on the fact that its own losses will be characterized as a “holocaust” and appear comparable in the Western media to something like Darfur or the slaughtering in Zimbabwe, or the usual carnage that we wake up to on the news. Take away Western press attention from Gaza, and Hamas is just another violent, illiberal regime that impoverishes its own people while seeking victim status in the West.

Is that too harsh? I don’t think so. Again, if it were to call a one-year truce with Israel, seek normal relations with Egypt, and swear off Iranian-Hezbollah terrorist aid while it sought to rebuild infrastructure, ensure security, and recruit foreign capital, then there would be no more world attention, and its cadres of hooded youth would lack the pizzazz of “militants.”

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home