16 November 2009

Seminario del visiting jihadist

How do we know that the attack at Fort Hood was an act of Islamist terrorism? Simple, Major Nidal Hassan told us so. You’ve seen reports of a long list of things he did and said along these lines. But what’s most amazing of all is this: Hassan is the first terrorist in history to give an academic lecture explaining why he was about to attack. Yet that still isn’t enough for too many people—including the president of the United States--to understand that the murderous assault at Fort Hood was a Jihad attack.

L'analisi di Barry Rubin sta qui.

Il maggiore Hasan in effetti si era posto il problema in dettaglio: in questa presentazione fatta ad altri soldati musulmani. Tre le cose che saltano all'occhio:
"hard for you to balance Islamic beliefs that might be conflicting with current war; feelings of guilt; is that what you expected.

Mulsim soldiers should not serve in any capacity that renders them at risk of hurting/killing believers unjustly.

Recommendation: DoD should allow said soldiers the option of being released as Conscientious objectors" to increase troop morale and decrease adverse events.

(Adverse events? Alcuni esempi alla slide 13, tra cui il sig. Akbar che ha fatto una strage con una granata tra i compagni della 101esima divisione paracadutisti - ma ce ne sono altri.)

Tristemente, that Hassan’s lecture has not been the centerpiece of the whole post-massacre debate is a true example of how impoverished are the “experts,” journalists, and politicians at dealing with these issues. Of course, without exploring the Islamic factor, they're wasting everyone's time. They're also going to be wasting quite a few lives.

E se qualcuno si chiedesse perche` il tizio sia diventato un nutbag islamista, ecco qui. Il jihadismo e' infiltrato, e di brutto. Il prossimo botto e' solo questione di tempo.

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home